2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
If S𝓏 and S𝓍 are spin-1 operators in the z basis, what are the results if S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) and S𝓍 (S𝓍 + ħ)(S𝓍 - ħ) are evaluated?
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
The spin eigenstates and eigenvalues are known from experiment for a spin-1 system, and the spin-z and spin-x operators in the z basis, S𝓏 and S𝓍 , have the following matrix representations:
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
S𝓏 ≐
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞
⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ and
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠
S𝓍 ≐
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
͟ħ͟ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞
√2 ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
Using the matrix representations, the expressions can be evaluated. For the spin-z operator, the expression S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) ≐
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎧ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎫ ⎧ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎫
⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎪ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ + ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ - ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎪,
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎩ ⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 1 ⎠ ⎭ ⎩ ⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 1 ⎠ ⎭
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
which simplifies to the matrix multiplication operation, where 𝟘 represents the 0 matrix,
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 2 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 0 0 0 ⎞
⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 -1 0 ⎟ = 𝟘 .
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
The multiplication operation apparently returns 𝟘 because the third factor will nullify any terms besides center terms, and the first factor will nullify any center terms.
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-21 11:25:14 +00:00
Similarly, S𝓍 (S𝓍 + ħ)(S𝓍 - ħ) ≐
2016-02-21 06:05:07 +00:00
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
͟ħ͟ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞ ͟ħ͟ ⎛ √2 1 0 ⎞ ͟ħ͟ ⎛ -√2 1 0 ⎞
√2 ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟ √2 ⎜ 1 √2 1 ⎟ √2 ⎜ 1 -√2 1 ⎟.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 √2 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 -√2 ⎠
2016-02-24 02:54:06 +00:00
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
Performing the multiplication operation on the last two matrices returns the expression
2016-02-24 02:54:06 +00:00
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
͟ħ͟³͟ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞ ⎛ -1 0 1 ⎞
2016-02-26 06:05:36 +00:00
2√2 ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ = 𝟘 .
2016-02-24 20:38:17 +00:00
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠ ⎝ 1 0 -1 ⎠
2016-02-26 06:05:36 +00:00
Because each pair of row and column in this matrix has alternating 0s and ±1s, every multiplication operation will return 0. The second expression is therefore equivalent to the zero matrix 𝟘 .