phy-4600/solutions/exam1/prob1
2016-02-24 15:38:17 -05:00

41 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

If S𝓏 and S𝓍 are spin-1 operators in the z basis, what are the results if S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) and S𝓍 (S𝓍 + ħ)(S𝓍 - ħ) are evaluated?
The spin eigenstates and eigenvalues are known from experiment for a spin-1 system, and the spin-z and spin-x operators in the z basis, S𝓏 and S𝓍, have the following matrix representations:
S𝓏
ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞
⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ and
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠
S𝓍
͟ħ͟ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞
√2 ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠
Using the matrix representations, the expressions can be evaluated. For the spin-z operator, the expression S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) ≐
ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎧ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎫ ⎧ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎫
⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎪ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ + ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ - ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎪,
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎩ ⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 1 ⎠ ⎭ ⎩ ⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 1 ⎠ ⎭
which simplifies to the matrix multiplication operation, where 𝟘 represents the 0 matrix,
ħ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 2 0 0 ⎞ ħ ⎛ 0 0 0 ⎞
⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 -1 0 ⎟ = 𝟘.
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠
The multiplication operation apparently returns 𝟘 because the third factor will nullify any terms besides center terms, and the first factor will nullify any center terms.
Similarly, S𝓍 (S𝓍 + ħ)(S𝓍 - ħ) ≐
͟ħ͟ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞ ͟ħ͟ ⎛ √2 1 0 ⎞ ͟ħ͟ ⎛ -√2 1 0 ⎞
√2 ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟ √2 ⎜ 1 √2 1 ⎟ √2 ⎜ 1 -√2 1 ⎟.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 √2 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 -√2 ⎠
Performing the multiplication operation on the last two matrices returns the expression
͟ħ͟³͟ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞ ⎛ -1 0 1 ⎞
2√2 ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ = 𝟘.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠ ⎝ 1 0 -1 ⎠
It is quite obvious that this operation returns 𝟘 since there are no components that will not match with a 0 throughout the multiplication of these matrices. Therefore, the second expression is also equivalent to the zero matrix 𝟘.