finished exam 1 prob 1, started prob 2

This commit is contained in:
caes 2016-02-21 06:25:14 -05:00
parent 44ebb2f8de
commit 1cfa2b813c
5 changed files with 3568 additions and 1718 deletions

0
solutions/exam1/.ps Normal file
View File

View File

@ -1,37 +1,33 @@
The characteristic equation for the spin operator S𝓏 is
If S𝓏 and S𝓍 are spin-1 operators in the z basis, what are the results if S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) and S𝓍 (S𝓍 + ħ)(S𝓍 - ħ) are evaluated?
S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) = 0.
The spin eigenstates and eigenvalues are known from experiment for a spin-1 system, and the spin-z and spin-x operators in the z basis, S𝓏 and S𝓍, have the following matrix representations:
The eigenvalues, which are the roots of this equation, are
λ = 0, ±ħ.
The S𝓏 operator is already diagonalized in its own basis, so the matrix has the immediately constructable form of
S𝓏
⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞
ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟
ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ and
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠
S𝓍
⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞
ħ ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠
Using the matrix representations, the expressions can be evaluated. For the spin-z operator, the expression S𝓏 (S𝓏 + ħ)(S𝓏 - ħ) ≐
To produce the operator S𝓏, one can apply the rotation matrix for a rotation about the y axis., where the angle of rotation is π/2.
⎛ cosθ 0 sinθ ⎞ ⎛ 0 0 1 ⎞
R = ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ = ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟
⎝-sinθ 0 cosθ ⎠ ⎝-1 0 0 ⎠
S𝓍 = S𝓏 R ≐
⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎛ 0 0 1 ⎞ ⎛ 0 0 1 ⎞
ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ = ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝-1 0 0 ⎠ ⎝-1 0 0 ⎠
The same is true for the S𝓍 operator in its basis. To express this operator in the z basis, however, it must be diagonalized.
⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎧ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎫ ⎧ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎫
ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ⎪ ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ + ħ ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎪ ⎪ ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ - ħ ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ⎪,
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎩ ⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 1 ⎠ ⎭ ⎩ ⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 1 ⎠ ⎭
which simplifies to the matrix multiplication operation, where 𝟘 represents the 0 matrix,
⎛ 1 0 0 ⎞ ⎛ 2 0 0 ⎞ ⎛ 0 0 0 ⎞
ħ ⎜ 0 0 0 ⎟ ħ ⎜ 0 1 0 ⎟ ħ ⎜ 0 -1 0 ⎟ = 𝟘.
⎝ 0 0 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 0 0 ⎠
The multiplication operation apparently returns 𝟘 because the third factor will nullify any terms besides center terms, and the first factor will nullify any center terms.
Similarly, S𝓍 (S𝓍 + ħ)(S𝓍 - ħ) ≐
⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞ ⎛ 1 1 0 ⎞ ⎛ -1 1 0 ⎞ ⎛ 1 1 1 ⎞ ⎛ -1 1 0 ⎞ ⎛ 0 1 0 ⎞
ħ³ ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟ ⎜ 1 1 1 ⎟ ⎜ 1 -1 1 ⎟ = ħ³ ⎜ 1 2 1 ⎟ ⎜ 1 -1 1 ⎟ = ħ³ ⎜ 1 0 1 ⎟.
⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 1 1 1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 -1 ⎠ ⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@ -1,47 +1,7 @@
͟d͟ ͟\<͟p͟\>͟ = - 〈͟d͟ ͟V͟(͟X͟)͟〉
dt dx
If a particle is subject to potential 〈V(x)〉
The potential is known, and in the absense of any non-conservative influences, the Hamiltonian is equal to the potential.
H(x) = V(x)
H|E〉 = E|E〉
Ĥ = ͟p̂͟²͟ + V(x̂)
2m
x̂ ≐ x
p̂ ≐ -ι ħ ͟d͟
dx
p̂² ≐ -ħ² ͟d͟²
dx²
Ĥ = ͟p̂͟²͟ + V(x̂)
2m
〈p̂〉 = ∫ dx p(x) =
-∞
d/dt ∫ dx p(x) =
Show that ͟d͟〈͟p͟〉͟ = -͟d͟V͟(͟x͟)͟〵 when a particle is subjected to a potential 〈V(x)〉.
dt 〵 dx
Probably start here:
〈V(x)〉 = ∫ dx V(x)
〈d/dx V(x)〉 = ∫ d/dx V(x) dx = V(x)
d/dt 〈p〉 = d/dt ∫ dx p(x)
the definition of momentum in function space is
d/dt p(x) = -d/dx V(x)

1652
solutions/exam1/prob2.ps Normal file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff