mirror of
https://asciireactor.com/otho/psdlag-agn.git
synced 2024-11-22 09:25:06 +00:00
working on report
This commit is contained in:
parent
85d6a15dd9
commit
ded8f46698
@ -1,18 +1,35 @@
|
|||||||
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper]{article}
|
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,fleqn]{article}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\usepackage{natbib}
|
\usepackage{natbib}
|
||||||
|
%\usepackage{cite}
|
||||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||||
\usepackage[margin=1.in,centering]{geometry}
|
\usepackage[margin=1.in,centering]{geometry}
|
||||||
|
\usepackage{hyperref}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{document}
|
\begin{document}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Consider two lightcurves $x(t)$ and $y(t)$, where $x(t)$ is the driving lightcurve and $y(t)$ is the reprocessed lightcurve. If they are related by a linear impulse response, $g(\tau)$, then:
|
\title{Optical/UV Band
|
||||||
|
Reverberation Mapping of NGC 5548 with Frequency-Resolved Techniques}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\author[Ulrich et al.]{
|
||||||
|
Otho A. Ulrich,$^{2}$\thanks{E-mail: otho.a.ulrich@wmich.edu}
|
||||||
|
Edward M. Cackett,$^{1}$
|
||||||
|
\\
|
||||||
|
% List of institutions
|
||||||
|
$^{1}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, Wayne State University, 666 W.
|
||||||
|
Hancock St., Detroit, MI 48201, USA\\
|
||||||
|
$^{2}$Department of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI
|
||||||
|
49008-5252, USA\\
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\date{August 8, 2016}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\maketitle
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{abstract}
|
\begin{abstract}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Power spectral densities and time delays of 19 wavelength bands are recovered
|
Power spectral densities and time delays of 19 wavelength bands are recovered
|
||||||
as part of a reverberation mapping of NGC 5548. The latest time-variable light
|
as part of a reverberation mapping of NGC 5548. The latest time-variable light
|
||||||
curves are made available in STORM III by \cite{2016ApJ...821...56F}. The
|
curves are made available in STORM III by \citet{2016ApJ...821...56F}. The
|
||||||
uneven distribution of flux data in those curves necessitates the use of a
|
uneven distribution of flux data in those curves necessitates the use of a
|
||||||
maximum likelihood method in conjunction with Fourier transformations to
|
maximum likelihood method in conjunction with Fourier transformations to
|
||||||
produce the frequency-dependent values of interest. Variability in the
|
produce the frequency-dependent values of interest. Variability in the
|
||||||
@ -22,34 +39,36 @@ wavelength dependence. There are issues computing accurate error estimates for
|
|||||||
both distributions that remain as yet unresolved. The transfer function should
|
both distributions that remain as yet unresolved. The transfer function should
|
||||||
be recoverable once those and any additional computational issues are
|
be recoverable once those and any additional computational issues are
|
||||||
resolved.
|
resolved.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{abstract}
|
\end{abstract}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Introduction}
|
\section{Introduction}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The local Type-I Seyfert galaxy NGC 5548, while perhaps the best-studied
|
The local Type-I Seyfert galaxy NGC 5548, while perhaps the best-studied
|
||||||
active galaxy, remains an object of intense interest and study to modern
|
active galaxy, remains an object of intense interest and study to modern
|
||||||
astronomy. An extensive observational campaign has been carried out on this
|
astronomy. Direct observation of active galactic nuclei (AGN) such as that
|
||||||
object, producing the most complete set of time-dependent light curves yet
|
thought to exist at the center of NGC 5548 is rarely possible. The astronomer
|
||||||
collected from an active galactic nucleus (AGN). The physics underlying the
|
may infer the properties of AGN from the dynamics of their variable spectra.
|
||||||
nature of these light curves is not completely understood, and so remains a
|
\citet{2016ApJ...821...56F} published the most complete set of time-dependent
|
||||||
topic of debate and great interest.
|
light curves yet collected from an active galactic nucleus as part III of
|
||||||
|
STORM, an extensive optical/UV observational campaign carried out on NGC 5548.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Reverberation Mapping}
|
\subsection{Reverberation Mapping}
|
||||||
A primary model of AGN suggests that an accretion disk is incident upon a
|
A primary model of AGN suggests that an accretion disk is incident upon a
|
||||||
central super-massive black hole (SMBH). Electromagnetic emission emergent
|
central super-massive black hole (SMBH). Electromagnetic emission emergent
|
||||||
from the accreting gases close to the SMBH is reprocessed by the
|
from a corona surrounding the SMBH is reprocessed by the
|
||||||
surrounding gas clouds, resulting in observed response delays between
|
surrounding gas clouds, resulting in observed response delays between
|
||||||
emission peaks that are dependent on the geometry of the system. The
|
emission peaks that are dependent on the geometry of the system. The
|
||||||
impulse response encodes this geometry, and astronomers have combined
|
impulse response encodes this geometry and other interactions, so recovering it from observed emission allows astronomers to probe the properties of
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
and astronomers have combined
|
||||||
models for the orbiting gas velocities and ionization states with these
|
models for the orbiting gas velocities and ionization states with these
|
||||||
observed time delays to calculate it for some known systems. This
|
observed time delays to calculate it for some known systems. This
|
||||||
technique has become a standard for calculating the black hole mass of
|
technique has become a standard for calculating the black hole mass of
|
||||||
AGN, and is well-described by \cite{2007MNRAS.380..669C} and
|
AGN, and is well-described by \citet{2007MNRAS.380..669C} and
|
||||||
\cite{2014A&ARv..22...72U}. It continues to be refined, and may also
|
\citet{2014A&ARv..22...72U}. It continues to be refined, and may also
|
||||||
become a tool to measure the black hole spin of these systems
|
become a tool to measure the black hole spin of these systems
|
||||||
\citep{2016arXiv160606736K}.
|
\citet{2016arXiv160606736K}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(Probably would be good to put a picture here describing simple
|
(Probably would be good to put a picture here describing simple
|
||||||
reverberation.)
|
reverberation.)
|
||||||
@ -76,7 +95,7 @@ topic of debate and great interest.
|
|||||||
toward
|
toward
|
||||||
constituting the transfer function of a system. Very good explanations of
|
constituting the transfer function of a system. Very good explanations of
|
||||||
these techniques and the associated mathematics are available from
|
these techniques and the associated mathematics are available from
|
||||||
\cite{2014A&ARv..22...72U}.
|
\citet{2014A&ARv..22...72U}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A top-hat function provides a simple model of the impulse response of a
|
A top-hat function provides a simple model of the impulse response of a
|
||||||
delayed light curve. A fast Fourier transform method of this impulse
|
delayed light curve. A fast Fourier transform method of this impulse
|
||||||
@ -92,12 +111,12 @@ topic of debate and great interest.
|
|||||||
\subsection{Unevenly-Spaced Data}
|
\subsection{Unevenly-Spaced Data}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some X-ray datasets contain gaps due to orbital mechanics, which motivated
|
Some X-ray datasets contain gaps due to orbital mechanics, which motivated
|
||||||
the work in \cite{2013ApJ...777...24Z}, where a maximum likelihood method
|
the work in \citet{2013ApJ...777...24Z}, where a maximum likelihood method
|
||||||
is used to perform Fourier analysis on light curves with gaps. Since its
|
is used to perform Fourier analysis on light curves with gaps. Since its
|
||||||
development, this technique has found success among studies of
|
development, this technique has found success among studies of
|
||||||
observations captured by low-orbit X-ray telescopes that exceed the
|
observations captured by low-orbit X-ray telescopes that exceed the
|
||||||
telescopes' orbital periods, such as the analysis performed by
|
telescopes' orbital periods, such as the analysis performed by
|
||||||
\cite{2016arXiv160606736K}. Until now, reverberation mapping in the
|
\citet{2016arXiv160606736K}. Until now, reverberation mapping in the
|
||||||
optical bands has been limited to time-domain techniques. Many datasets
|
optical bands has been limited to time-domain techniques. Many datasets
|
||||||
available for these bands have uneven sampling across the time domain,
|
available for these bands have uneven sampling across the time domain,
|
||||||
however, and so do not lend themselves well to time-domain or traditional
|
however, and so do not lend themselves well to time-domain or traditional
|
||||||
@ -115,7 +134,7 @@ each band in the dataset -- 18 bands not including the reference band.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
The light curves analysed here are unevenly distributed along the time axis,
|
The light curves analysed here are unevenly distributed along the time axis,
|
||||||
which suggests that the maximum likelihood method developed by
|
which suggests that the maximum likelihood method developed by
|
||||||
\cite{2013ApJ...777...24Z} is a reasonable candidate for producing the PSD and
|
\citet{2013ApJ...777...24Z} is a reasonable candidate for producing the PSD and
|
||||||
time delays in the frequency domain. The latest version (CHECK THIS) of the
|
time delays in the frequency domain. The latest version (CHECK THIS) of the
|
||||||
C++ program psdlag associated with that work is used to directly produce the
|
C++ program psdlag associated with that work is used to directly produce the
|
||||||
PSD and cross spectra. The time delay spectrum is produced from the cross
|
PSD and cross spectra. The time delay spectrum is produced from the cross
|
||||||
@ -123,7 +142,7 @@ spectrum by dividing it by $2 \pi f$, with $f$ the mean frequency for a given
|
|||||||
bin.
|
bin.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Dataset}
|
\subsection{Dataset}
|
||||||
\cite{2016ApJ...821...56F} published the best dynamic data yet collected
|
\citet{2016ApJ...821...56F} published the best dynamic data yet collected
|
||||||
from NGC 5548 over a 200-day (CHECK THIS) period, for 19 bands throughout
|
from NGC 5548 over a 200-day (CHECK THIS) period, for 19 bands throughout
|
||||||
the optical and into the UV spectra. These data were collected from a
|
the optical and into the UV spectra. These data were collected from a
|
||||||
variety of observatories, including both space and ground-based
|
variety of observatories, including both space and ground-based
|
||||||
@ -138,10 +157,11 @@ bin.
|
|||||||
limit of the true variability. Scanning the likelihood function can
|
limit of the true variability. Scanning the likelihood function can
|
||||||
provide better error estimates at the cost of computation time, as can
|
provide better error estimates at the cost of computation time, as can
|
||||||
running Monte Carlo simulations. All of these methods are built into the
|
running Monte Carlo simulations. All of these methods are built into the
|
||||||
psdlag program provided by \cite{2013ApJ...777...24Z}, however, some
|
psdlag program provided by \citet{2013ApJ...777...24Z}, however, some
|
||||||
issues have prevented proper error analysis using the latter two methods.
|
issues have prevented proper error analysis using the latter two methods.
|
||||||
This is discussed in more detail in section \ref{results}.
|
This is discussed in more detail in section \ref{results}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{Results}
|
\section{Results}
|
||||||
\label{results}
|
\label{results}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -189,11 +209,19 @@ and time delays. With reverberation mapping, the goal is to recover the transfer
|
|||||||
function, which encodes the geometry of the system. Recovering the time delays
|
function, which encodes the geometry of the system. Recovering the time delays
|
||||||
is a significant step toward that goal.
|
is a significant step toward that goal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
%\bsp
|
||||||
|
\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
|
||||||
|
\bibliography{wsu_reu}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Consider two lightcurves $x(t)$ and $y(t)$, where $x(t)$ is the driving lightcurve and $y(t)$ is the reprocessed lightcurve. If they are related by a linear impulse response, $g(\tau)$, then:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -229,4 +257,10 @@ C(\nu) = X^*(\nu) G(\nu) X(\nu) = G(\nu) |X(\nu)|^2
|
|||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
thus, for a given impulse response function, one can trivially predict the time lags as a function of frequency, $\tau(\nu)$, by calculating the phase of $G(\nu)$, and the frequency dependence of the lags directly relates to the shape of the response function.
|
thus, for a given impulse response function, one can trivially predict the time lags as a function of frequency, $\tau(\nu)$, by calculating the phase of $G(\nu)$, and the frequency dependence of the lags directly relates to the shape of the response function.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user